23.07.2008  
     
 
The Obama World Tour Looks A Lot Less "Risky" Right Now
 
  For all the warnings from the media about how "risky" Barack Obama's world tour would be -- and I was one of the people who issued such a warning very early on -- so far, it's hard to imagine how it could have gone better for him. There's more yet to go, and the ultimate effect of it probably will not be determined until polls afterwards. But let's take a look at what Obama's gotten out of it so far.

Separate from, but surely deliberately timed to, Obama's trip, is the now quite indisputable fact that the government of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is more aligned with Obama on a U.S. troop pullout than his Republican opponent, John McCain. There can be no more denials or ambiguities on this, thanks to third party translations of Maliki's original remarks and subsequent comments by a spokesman that point to substantial agreement with Obama. He's gotten good news in other ways, too, such as Great Britain's own plans for Iraq. He's gotten tons of images of himself looking presidential, one of the areas where he's lagged behind McCain in the polls, by meeting with foreign leaders. He's getting more glowing press than ever, perhaps more than he will ever get, which is saying something. As Obama's jump shot with the troops has made evening news rundowns, McCain has been left, somewhat pitifully, complaining about the lack of news coverage, being greeted by crickets in Maine and despite his own history of receiving glowing press, just generally being left in the dust in this category. Meanwhile, McCain's gotten attention primarily for increasing press notice of his own, foreign policy-related gaffes.

That's not to say Obama's trip has gone perfectly. His uncertain response in a television interview about the apparently successful troop surge that he opposed but McCain backed shows that this particular issue continues to be an advantage for the Republican and a weak point for the Democrat. There are grumblings that maybe he's been a little too concerned with appearing presidential, prematurely, something that plays into the perception of some voters that Obama is arrogant (whether it's accurate or not, this perception could be damaging -- on my last visit to my hometown in Indiana, more than a few relatives who tend to vote Democratic but only follow politics casually and vote said they were having a hard time embracing him for this very reason). Obama's done as well as he can explaining away his apparent shifts on Israel, but they still count as stumbles.

Add it all up, though. When you combine the successes and failures of the trip to this point, can anyone say Obama has done more harm than good to his presidential bid with the trip? Coming soon is the Europe wing. There are plenty of subjects he can discuss there.
 
 
 
Tim Starks 23.07.2008, 03:45 # 4 Comments
0 Trackbacks
 
 
     
4 Comments

  Obama has been accused of inconsistency. In his book (Bad Samaritans, 2007), the University of Cambridge economist, Ha-Joon Chang, narrates how once accused of inconsistency,John Meynard Keynes famously responded: "when the facts change, I change my mind -what do you do sir?"

Many, although, unfortunately, not all of those who accuse Obama of inconsistency are like Keynes.

 
  J. Koroma | Homepage | E-Mail | 26.07.2008, 18:29  
 
 
  Where were all of these critics when Bush Jr. was running for President? He gaffes now while he is President and everyone ignores it. Obama handles himself with poise and intelligence and eveyone calls him arrogant. Double standard? I think so.
The standard for behavoir in an American President has been lowered so much over the past 7 years that no one can believe that Obama can really be that smart and globally savy. If Obama were white none of this would be an issue.
 
  G Johnson | Homepage | E-Mail | 24.07.2008, 21:16  
 
 
  McCain has little chances of winning the election anyways, so as long as Obama does not make any big "gaffes", things'll be fine.

Americans are focused on domestic issues this election, foreign policy is not our main concern. Obama has a clear lead on domestic issues, from our energy issues to fixing the mortgage and bank failure fallout.

Al Maliki has already stamped Obama as the guy with the right plan to end occupation there, so I think it shows that the Republicans have no foreign credibility.



 
  Scott N.H. usa | Homepage | 23.07.2008, 23:45  
 
 
  I think Obama has done a good job so far. People are amazing, when Obama doesn't look presidential they complain that he isn't ready yet but when he does they complain. The best credits have been given by the Iraqis who agree that the troops must leave their country. Why does Mccain want to keep US troops in a country they are not wanted???Go Obama  
  Fred - Australia | Homepage | E-Mail | 23.07.2008, 05:46  
 
 
Name
E-Mail
Home
Entry
Home DW-WORLD