Wow Carlos had the nerve top say Condeleeza Rice has more experience then Hillary and Hilllary lacks educational experience. I would like to see the educational experience you have. Are you still working on that high school diploma; is that why you do not read the news paper? Did you even read any of Hillary's in depth proposals In fact she had the best exit strategy for Iraq compared with any other candidate ranked by retired US Generals. Did you even hear Clinton's speech on human rights in China. But why should we listen to the facts Carlos when you are apparently are the expert on foreign policy!!!!
Dear Carlos Navarro, your a twit and must be a republican. Senator Clinton, excuse me, Madam Secretary Clinton will be a fabulous Secretary-of-State. You will be eating, excuse me, choking on your workds shortly. So the 18 million voters were just "feminists and less educated" who voted for her? Your a snob and your wrong. Take your republican junk and go to another site. You bore us. Go Hillary
Horrible article. Obviously nothing in depth here.
The economy did much better in the nineties than today.
Hillary has shown she is a loyal and dedicated worker. With the exception of hard core republicans, most people would invite an intelligent person to represent their country.
Barack Obama’s decision to name Hillary Clinton the Secretary of State post could well turn out to be his first major blunder, for these obvious reasons:
First, there’s the inseparable bond with her husband Bill. Given the duo’s unquenchable thirst for power, they would not be content to play second fiddle. From day one they would be scheming to usurp control of the White House. Once they get a foothold, Obama would be hard-pressed to rein them in.
Then, there’s the Clintons’ long history of corruption, deception and sleaze—Whitewatergate, Pardongate, Cattle-futuresgate, Chinagate, Filegate, Fellatiogate, the using of uniformed marines as waiters, the plundering of White House property, the Impeachment and near conviction, the punitive IRS audits, the violent deaths of potentially incriminating witness. This alone would provide Obama’s enemies with all the grime they needed to smear his presidency.
Consider further that unlike a Condoleezza Rice or a Madelaine Albright—not to mention bona fide statesmen like Henry Kissinger, Dean Rusk and John Foster Dulles--Hillary Clinton lacks the educational and cultural gravitas to represent our nation abroad. Her lawyering in Arkansas and stint in Congress doesn’t quite cut it. She did get 18 million votes in the Democratic primaries, probably more than Obama, but a large proportion of those votes were cast by diehard feminists and the less educated, hardly the constituency whose support lends credibility to a Secretary of State.
Barack Obama should recall the reasons why he didn’t choose Hillary as his VP running mate. For his and the nation’s sake, let us hope that she changes her mind and spurns the Secretary of State offer. Her coyness in reaching her decision--making Obama beg, in effect--is already an ominous sign.
wow bad article, maybe you should stick to writing about german politics. This article is nothing but opinion written by an ally of someone like newt gingrich or pat buchannan. If fails to mention that most americans republican and democrat believes she will make an excellent secretary of state and fails to mention all her accomplishments at yale law, serving on various comittees in washingto dc, then in arkansas, as first lady, and being one of the most successful junior senators ever in the history of the us senate. I cant stand when people bash hillary based on opinion
or hate if you are going to be serious talk facts and the truth otherwise you are just another dick morris.
The economy did much better in the nineties than today.
Hillary has shown she is a loyal and dedicated worker. With the exception of hard core republicans, most people would invite an intelligent person to represent their country.
First, there’s the inseparable bond with her husband Bill. Given the duo’s unquenchable thirst for power, they would not be content to play second fiddle. From day one they would be scheming to usurp control of the White House. Once they get a foothold, Obama would be hard-pressed to rein them in.
Then, there’s the Clintons’ long history of corruption, deception and sleaze—Whitewatergate, Pardongate, Cattle-futuresgate, Chinagate, Filegate, Fellatiogate, the using of uniformed marines as waiters, the plundering of White House property, the Impeachment and near conviction, the punitive IRS audits, the violent deaths of potentially incriminating witness. This alone would provide Obama’s enemies with all the grime they needed to smear his presidency.
Consider further that unlike a Condoleezza Rice or a Madelaine Albright—not to mention bona fide statesmen like Henry Kissinger, Dean Rusk and John Foster Dulles--Hillary Clinton lacks the educational and cultural gravitas to represent our nation abroad. Her lawyering in Arkansas and stint in Congress doesn’t quite cut it. She did get 18 million votes in the Democratic primaries, probably more than Obama, but a large proportion of those votes were cast by diehard feminists and the less educated, hardly the constituency whose support lends credibility to a Secretary of State.
Barack Obama should recall the reasons why he didn’t choose Hillary as his VP running mate. For his and the nation’s sake, let us hope that she changes her mind and spurns the Secretary of State offer. Her coyness in reaching her decision--making Obama beg, in effect--is already an ominous sign.
or hate if you are going to be serious talk facts and the truth otherwise you are just another dick morris.
I linked to it.
All the best,
Elvis